Table of Contents
Never ever had an engine problem. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just seemed like a diesel.
I ask yourself how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's very own method ... the 300i6 would certainly do everything I need this truck to do patgizz wrote: 3 things in the auto globe refuse to break.
those ought to be held as the benchmark to which whatever else is determined. Virtually whatever else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based on the chevy stovebolt 6 certainly) Wow, as a result of the outpour of praise, it looked good so I bought it, here's the advertisement lmk what you guys assume Oops, really did not suggest to be puzzling, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
Order of biz though, I'm relatively large, and the steering wheel to seat is relatively slim ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my satisfaction:-LRB- The only issue I've ever before seen with vehicles like that, are busted shifters. Ford made them a little also hard and they would certainly snap right at the floorboard.
Maintain in mind the gas mileage will not be the ideal in the world, however it will damn sure run permanently. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had plenty of space in the taxi of them. wbjones composed: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 highway with the OD5. I wonder how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's own means ... The engine bay wasn't designed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One container remove an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, but it draws. Mod electric motors need to come out sidewards and you have to draw the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core assistance does not unbolt like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane wrote: spitfirebill composed: In respond to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he claim to warrant this? I'm really curious. I didn't see anything in his reply that would certainly require this reaction. "They are usually reputable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled created: wbjones created: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Corrosion is a different story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 freeway with the OD5. I question exactly how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Extremely extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I didn't explain ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor because when I needed to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through each in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up truly severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to talk regarding a couple of issues of these vans, however I I'm clearly not going to come out and claim one is far better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. Let's talk concerning engine and really just to define that the design years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you understand, I suggest, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a version of a Chevy van has been around because, you understand, around that time too. Because 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
You understand, Fords, and many of them come with the Triton V8. There's a great deal of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with impact to these engines, due to the fact that they didn't have adequate threading in the ignition system, which created problems. And commonly that would take place when you could be in a 15 traveler bus going up a hillside with a lots of people and all of an unexpected boom, a trigger plug pops out and you're stranded.
Really very confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I didn't make clear ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I added that factor due to the fact that when I had to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up actually terribly.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to chat concerning a couple of concerns of these vans, but I I'm plainly not going to come out and state one is far better than the various other. So if that's what you're seeking, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are a few of the differences in between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the exact same car.
They appear to be a little extra used in that location, but, you recognize, those are several of the usages, however they're essentially the same category of car. Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. What problems do you see in between these two vehicles? Bernie: Yeah. So let's talk about engine and really simply to define that the version years, we're mosting likely to begin with 2000 and up, you know, I indicate, these vans have been around for a lengthy time.
And, you recognize, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you recognize, around that time too. Since 2000, I imply, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with impact to these engines, due to the fact that they didn't have sufficient threading in the spark plug, which caused troubles.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership around El Paso
Ford F150 dealership
Ford F150 dealer near me El Paso